Business ethics in the NAFTA countries: A cross-cultural comparison
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article examines the nature and extent of similarities and differences in cultural values among managers in the three nations that signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). One component of a culture is ethics, with this aspect of a culture existing as a potentially strong influence on the success of business organizations. In order to explore the impact of culture on ethical decision making in the NAFTA countries, we review the literature and develop propositions concerning the dimensions of culture that would be expected to influence the ethical standards applied to business decisions and organizational practices. The analysis applies Hofstede’s [Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.] four cultural dimensions in the three NAFTA countries, which include individualism vs. collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, power distance, and masculinity. We also examine three additional cultural factors — attitude toward work, problem solving, and view of human nature. Propositions are presented involving the prevalence of codes of ethics, issues relating to bribery of public officials, and treatment of low-level employees. Finally, we discuss research design issues relevant for empirical investigation of the propositions. D 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Managers in the Nafta Countries: a Cross-cultural Comparison of Attitudes towards Upward Influence Strategies
This paper presents a cross-cultural comparison of U.S., Canadian-Anglophone, CanadianFrancophone and Mexican managers' attitudes towards upward influence strategies. Generally, it was found that all four groups have similar perspectives in terms of the relative acceptability of various influence strategies. However, examination of absolute ratings of influence behaviors suggests that Canadian-...
متن کاملManagers in the NAFTA countries: A cross-cultural comparison of attitudes toward upward influence strategies
This paper presents a cross-cultural comparison of U.S., Canadian-Anglophone, Canadian-Francophone, and Mexican managers’ attitudes toward upward influence strategies. Generally, it was found that all four groups have similar perspectives in terms of the relative acceptability of various influence strategies. However, examination of absolute ratings of influence behaviors suggests that Canadian...
متن کاملCross-Cultural Time Sensitivity in a Bilateral E-Negotiation System
For a long time, culture has been an influencing parameter in negotiations. Growth of international trades and business competitions has increased the importance of negotiations among countries and different cultures. Developing new technologies, particularly the use of artificial intelligence in electronic trading areas, has provided us with the application of intelligent agents to resolve cha...
متن کاملMacIntyrean virtue ethics in business: a cross-cultural comparison
This paper seeks to establish whether the categories of MacIntyrean virtue ethics as applied to business organizations are meaningful in a non-western business context. It does so by building on research reported in Moore (Organ Stud, 33(3): 363-387, 2012) in which the application of virtue ethics to business organizations was investigated empirically in the UK, based on a conceptual framework ...
متن کاملThe use of English questionnaires in cross-national research
Cross-national research is plagued by many obstacles. This article focuses on one of these obstacles: the fact that research in more than one country usually involves subjects with different native languages. We investigated whether the language of the questionnaire influences response patterns. More specifically we tested the cultural accommodation hypothesis: Do respondents subconsciously adj...
متن کامل